The NanoExplore project has successfully ended! The Final Project Report is ready for your download. It covers the project activities from...
Resulting from Task B2.3b, in a pilot clinical study, OPEA allowed for distinguishing participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aimed to assess whether abnormal spirometry parameters and immunity against SARS-CoV-2 are associated with increased OPEA and estimating the OPEA reference interval. Abstract: In a pilot clinical study, OPEA allowed for distinguishing participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aimed to assess whether abnormal spirometry parameters and immunity against SARS-CoV-2 are associated with increased OPEA and estimating the OPEA reference interval. Swiss adult residents of the Vaud Canton aged 20–69 years randomly selected from the Federal Statistical Office’s registries, speaking French or German, were included and examined between 1 October 2020 and 31 December 2021. General health status and presence of respiratory diseases were assessed by questionnaire and spirometry. Spirometric results were compared with the predicted values and their lower limits of norms of the Global Lung Function Initiative. SARS-CoV-2-seroprevalence was assessed using the Luminex-based test of IgG. Statistical analysis consisted of unilateral t-tests and ANOVA. Lower and upper limit of OPEA reference interval with associated 90%-confidence interval (90%CI) were estimated for the sub-sample of healthy adults by bootstrap, after excluding outliers. The study sample included 247 participants. SARS-CoV-2-seropositive participants and those with an obstructive syndrome had a significantly higher OPEA than seronegative and healthy participants. The estimated reference interval was: −0.0516 (90%CI = −0.0735; −0.0316); −0.0044 (90%CI = −0.0224; 0.0153). OPEA could predict inflammatory-based respiratory disorders, but needs further validation in different settings and for other pathologies. (October 2022)
Read publication hereThis publication contains the results of a study about the production and handling of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). The goal was to find out the reasons why workers and managers would or would not participate in biomonitoring programs, which can help with risk assessment and safety measures for workers. The results of the study are useful in designing appropriate biomonitoring programs for workers exposed to ENMs.
Read publication hereImplementation of a harmonized approach for monitoring exposure to engineered and incidental nanoparticles and their potential health effects: First results from the EU-LIFE project NanoExplore. Published on Saf Health Work 2022;13:S1eS86.
Read publication hereOxidative stress has been associated with various inflammation-related human diseases. It is defined as an imbalance between the production and elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS can oxidize proteins, lipids, and DNA, and some of these oxidized products are excreted in urine, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), which is considered a biomarker for oxidative damage of lipids. To interpret changes of this biomarker as a measure of oxidative species overproduction in humans, a background range for urinary MDA concentration in the general population is needed.
Read publication hereThe NanoExplore project has successfully ended! The Final Project Report is ready for your download. It covers the project activities from...
Irina Guseva Canu, Ekaterina Plys, Camille Crézé, Carlos Fito, Nancy B. Hopf, Athena Progiou, Chiara Riganti, Jean-Jacques Sauvain, Giulia...
NanoExplore Webinar: Novelties that NanoExplore brings...
Read about the results of NanoExplore in an interview with Aikaterini-Maria Zarogianni from NECCA, Greece....